CARC16ReferenceCurrentVerified Aug 15, 2026CARC 16
AR Guide Workflow
Missing Information
The claim was missing required information or had a submission or billing error, so the payer could not process it. This is usually a correction, not an appeal.
AR Guide explanation
What it means
The payer could not process the claim as submitted because required information was missing or the claim had a submission or billing error. A remark code should accompany this code to explain what is missing.
AR Guide knowledge
Common denial category
Missing Information — The claim was missing required information or had a submission or billing error, so the payer could not process it. This is usually a correction, not an appeal.
AR Guide knowledge
Common causes
- Missing or invalid modifier
- Incorrect or missing patient/provider information
- Incomplete coding or missing required fields
- Claim rejected by an edit before adjudication
AR Guide knowledge
What AR should verify
- Read the remark code(s) that accompany CARC 16 to identify the exact issue
- Compare the claim to the original submission
- Check the claim scrubber/edit report for the flagged element
AR Guide knowledge
Recommended action
- Fix the specific flagged element and resubmit
- Do not resubmit an unchanged claim expecting a different result
- If the claim is unprocessable (e.g. MA130), correct it rather than appeal
AR Guide knowledge
Escalation
- If the payer cannot identify the missing element, escalate to a supervisor with the full claim and remark details.
AR Guide knowledge
QA checkpoint
- Document what was corrected so the resubmission can be audited
- Verify the resubmitted claim clears the original edit
About this guidance: Note
AR Guide knowledge is general reference content written by our team — it is not payer-specific policy and never replaces the payer’s documentation or your contract. Always confirm specifics with the payer.